Team-owned tasks (part 4)

The final practice Arlo described was team-owned tasks. Avoiding assigning tasks to people is very important to encourage team responsibility, which leads to team accountability, which is a necessary requisite to building strong self-organizing teams.

I’m sure you’ve seen all kinds of code. In fact, just by reading the code you can very often tell who wrote it. The code base reflects who wrote it. The same applies to code bases written by teams. If you have two teams you’ll have two completely different code bases. If you have one team managing two products, you’ll probably end up with one product that can be configured into two.

Again, this is nothing new, but the way they do it in conjunction with promiscuous pairing is a bit new: Arlo’s teams would assign tasks to computers. You’d have the “red box” and the “blue box”, and tasks would stay with the computer while developers would cycle through.


Share it on...
del.icio.us  Digg it  Netscape  Newsvine  reddit  StumbleUpon  Yahoo MyWeb  

4 Responses to “Team-owned tasks (part 4)”

  1. Bjørn Stabell 白熊 » Blog Archive » The agile experiment (part 1) Says:

    […] Part 4: Practice: Team-owned tasks […]

  2. Bjørn Stabell 白熊 » Blog Archive » Arlo’s agile experiment summary (part 5) Says:

    […] Bjørn Stabell 白熊 thought exception, brain dumped… « Team-owned tasks (part 4) […]

  3. Bjørn Stabell 白熊 » Blog Archive » Promiscuous pairing (part 2) Says:

    […] Part 4: Practice: Team-owned tasks […]

  4. Bjørn Stabell 白熊 » Blog Archive » Least qualified implementor (part 3) Says:

    […] Bjørn Stabell 白熊 thought exception, brain dumped… « Promiscuous pairing (part 2) Team-owned tasks (part 4) » […]

Leave a Reply


tracker